Dating back to 1802 when the United States Military Academy was founded in West Point, N.Y., Congress has chartered the U.S. service academies to graduate officers who are capable of serving in leadership roles to protect and defend our nation.
I can tell you from personal experience, as a proud graduate of the Naval Academy, just how competitive and limited admission to the service academies is. There are 4,400 total spots available in each academy, and no more than 1,350 students are admitted each year.
The application process itself is not easy. Nominees are put forward by members of Congress, as well as the president, vice president, and senior military officers. Generations of service academy graduates have been citizens of incredible distinction and accomplishment: presidents and admirals, Medal of Honor recipients, and Noble Prize winners. Those who would take up the profession of arms, and join their ranks, must clear a high hurdle.
But in recent years, other considerations have begun to displace rigor and merit. Government agency directives and presidential executive orders have mandated increased diversity across the federal workforce.
As part of this initiative, the Department of Defense promotes “equal opportunity, diversity, and inclusion” in the service academies, which it oversees. Today, too often our service academies are using those metrics as a way to maximize the diversity of those admitted, not their merit.
This is discrimination. It is in conflict with our Constitution. And it undermines military readiness at a time of rising threats to America’s safety from strategic competitors, rogue states, and terrorists.
Read my National Review column here. |